1. Introduction

It is generally considered that excimer lasers for
lithography tools require high running costs. Equipment with a
relatively low running cost is much sought after. Because replacement
of each module of a laser unit costs tens of millions of yen, many
users even in the gigantic semiconductor industry worry about subsidizing
the expense for their running cost. Also, since the laser unit
used in combination with the lithography tool is one of the critical
factors affecting wafer throughput, it must operate in a stable
manner. Therefore, it has long been said that “Low Running
Cost and Stable Operation” are musts for a laser unit.
Performance Means Running Cost and Stable Operation Only?

Does the performance of the laser unit actually affect such key
performance indices for wafer processing as resolution and depth
of focus (DOF)? The answer is, “Yes, it affects them greatly.” Typically,
the spectrum, wavelength, and energy affect, respectively, the
resolution, depth of focus, and uniformity.
So, why has this issue not yet been further discussed? The reason
is that the lithography tool has been running with a sufficient
performance margin; that is, for the target resolution, NA (Numerical
Aperture) and k1 are big enough.
Today, however, laser performance can no longer be ignored in
the quest to achieve 90-nm node lithography by a KrF laser and
65-nm node lithography by an ArF laser.
The Influence of Spectrum

Let me explain the importance of the laser by giving a familiar
example. Spectrum may be listed as one of the most important performance
indices for the laser unit. We’ll discuss the details of
spectrum later; the important point is that fluctuation of the
spectrum directly affects the critical dimension (CD).
It is widely known that control over the gate size is the most important
aspect in the formation of logic patterns. The gate is formed by
isolated lines. In the ArF lithography process, the variation of
the CD of each isolated line per 1 pm of spectrum is approx. 3 nm
to form a 90-nm (k1 = 0.4) pattern. Also, it has been confirmed that
if k1 is lowered to 0.35, it causes a variation of 8 nm per 1 pm.
Taking into the consideration that the spectrum variation for the
actual ArF laser is approx. 0.5 pm, the laser unit alone causes the
CD to vary by 4 nm. Even in the KrF lithography process, the spectrum
causes the same effect on the CD (though not to the degree of ArF
lithography). KrF lithography causes a variation of 4 nm per 1 pm
on a 110-nm (k1=0.35) pattern.
This is a typical example for understanding that the influence of
the laser can no longer be ignored in current lithography processes
that require tight CD control within a few percent.
>>Page Top
|